Search results for "New Research Horizon Review"

showing 1 items of 1 documents

The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0

2016

STUDY QUESTION: We wanted to probe the opinions and current practices on preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), and more specifically on PGS in its newest form: PGS 2.0? STUDY FINDING: Consensus is lacking on which patient groups, if any at all, can benefit from PGS 2.0 and, a fortiori, whether all IVF patients should be offered PGS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is clear from all experts that PGS 2.0 can be defined as biopsy at the blastocyst stage followed by comprehensive chromosome screening and possibly combined with vitrification. Most agree that mosaicism is less of an issue at the blastocyst stage than at the cleavage stage but whether mosaicism is no issue at all at the blastocyst st…

0301 basic medicineEmbryologymedia_common.quotation_subjectFertilityBiology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePregnancyGeneticsCleavage stagemedicineHumansGenetic TestingMolecular BiologyPreimplantation Diagnosismedia_commonGenetic testingGeneticsMedical educationblastocyst biopsy030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicinemedicine.diagnostic_testCompeting interestsurogenital systempreimplantation embryoObstetrics and Gynecologymassive parallel sequencingCell BiologyLarge scale dataEmbryo biopsyRedactionAneuploidyNew Research Horizon ReviewReproductive geneticsvitrification030104 developmental biologychromosomal abnormalitiesReproductive Medicinearray comparative genomic hybridizationFemalelipids (amino acids peptides and proteins)Developmental Biologypreimplantation genetic screeningMolecular Human Reproduction
researchProduct